<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategic Pricing Using Value Equivalence Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines</link>
	<description>Greg Strosaker on leadership, marketing, strategy, productivity, parenting autism, and running</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:47:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: moncler</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>moncler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Strategic Pricing  it;s hard to understand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strategic Pricing  it;s hard to understand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Accetta</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Accetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Your post made me think of exploring new things in my managerial strategies. Somehow I think I should implement the changes no matter how hard it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post made me think of exploring new things in my managerial strategies. Somehow I think I should implement the changes no matter how hard it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Jim, thanks for your comment and I recognize this one&#039;s a bit lengthy, but I&#039;m particularly passionate about pricing as I view it as both critical and misunderstood.  Services are a special challenge, and the &quot;cost-plus&quot; mentality is often even harder to break as pricing is typically set by hours x hourly rates, and many clients are smart enough to estimate how long something should take. There are some companies in marketing and legal services that are implementing more fixed-fee models (a certain price for a press release, or for a patent filing, for example) and in this case the VEL approach may help set pricing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another new model emerging include fee for performance (for example, a marketing agency charging per lead they develop).  Technology can play a role in supporting more advanced pricing models as well, by being able to generate real time feedback on usage of an asset or results of a campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I think your last comment is very typical - in many cases, the first price asked for can and should be higher.  Any time someone accepts the first offer, you have to realize that you probably left money on the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, thanks for your comment and I recognize this one&#39;s a bit lengthy, but I&#39;m particularly passionate about pricing as I view it as both critical and misunderstood.  Services are a special challenge, and the &#8220;cost-plus&#8221; mentality is often even harder to break as pricing is typically set by hours x hourly rates, and many clients are smart enough to estimate how long something should take. There are some companies in marketing and legal services that are implementing more fixed-fee models (a certain price for a press release, or for a patent filing, for example) and in this case the VEL approach may help set pricing.</p>
<p>Another new model emerging include fee for performance (for example, a marketing agency charging per lead they develop).  Technology can play a role in supporting more advanced pricing models as well, by being able to generate real time feedback on usage of an asset or results of a campaign.</p>
<p>And I think your last comment is very typical &#8211; in many cases, the first price asked for can and should be higher.  Any time someone accepts the first offer, you have to realize that you probably left money on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Matorin</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Matorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Greg: Thought provoking blog.  So much material, I am going to have to circle back and re-read.  You are right, when I worked in Corporate America in product managment, I did not spend that much time on pricing since being in food, it was usually dictated by competitive conditions.  However, my all time favorite pricing strategy was when I worked on saltines, a story for another day.  Now that I am in the service business, I use a lot of &lt;br&gt;psychology when it comes to pricing focused on the perceived outcome of the services provided, but I want to circle back and better understand how VEL would come into play.  One thing I have learned about pricing since being on my own, once I land a project, I realize I could have asked for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: Thought provoking blog.  So much material, I am going to have to circle back and re-read.  You are right, when I worked in Corporate America in product managment, I did not spend that much time on pricing since being in food, it was usually dictated by competitive conditions.  However, my all time favorite pricing strategy was when I worked on saltines, a story for another day.  Now that I am in the service business, I use a lot of <br />psychology when it comes to pricing focused on the perceived outcome of the services provided, but I want to circle back and better understand how VEL would come into play.  One thing I have learned about pricing since being on my own, once I land a project, I realize I could have asked for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Jim, thanks for your comment and I recognize this one&#039;s a bit lengthy, but I&#039;m particularly passionate about pricing as I view it as both critical and misunderstood.  Services are a special challenge, and the &quot;cost-plus&quot; mentality is often even harder to break as pricing is typically set by hours x hourly rates, and many clients are smart enough to estimate how long something should take. There are some companies in marketing and legal services that are implementing more fixed-fee models (a certain price for a press release, or for a patent filing, for example) and in this case the VEL approach may help set pricing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another new model emerging include fee for performance (for example, a marketing agency charging per lead they develop).  Technology can play a role in supporting more advanced pricing models as well, by being able to generate real time feedback on usage of an asset or results of a campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I think your last comment is very typical - in many cases, the first price asked for can and should be higher.  Any time someone accepts the first offer, you have to realize that you probably left money on the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, thanks for your comment and I recognize this one&#39;s a bit lengthy, but I&#39;m particularly passionate about pricing as I view it as both critical and misunderstood.  Services are a special challenge, and the &#8220;cost-plus&#8221; mentality is often even harder to break as pricing is typically set by hours x hourly rates, and many clients are smart enough to estimate how long something should take. There are some companies in marketing and legal services that are implementing more fixed-fee models (a certain price for a press release, or for a patent filing, for example) and in this case the VEL approach may help set pricing.</p>
<p>Another new model emerging include fee for performance (for example, a marketing agency charging per lead they develop).  Technology can play a role in supporting more advanced pricing models as well, by being able to generate real time feedback on usage of an asset or results of a campaign.</p>
<p>And I think your last comment is very typical &#8211; in many cases, the first price asked for can and should be higher.  Any time someone accepts the first offer, you have to realize that you probably left money on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Matorin</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Matorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Greg: Thought provoking blog.  So much material, I am going to have to circle back and re-read.  You are right, when I worked in Corporate America in product managment, I did not spend that much time on pricing since being in food, it was usually dictated by competitive conditions.  However, my all time favorite pricing strategy was when I worked on saltines, a story for another day.  Now that I am in the service business, I use a lot of &lt;br&gt;psychology when it comes to pricing focused on the perceived outcome of the services provided, but I want to circle back and better understand how VEL would come into play.  One thing I have learned about pricing since being on my own, once I land a project, I realize I could have asked for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: Thought provoking blog.  So much material, I am going to have to circle back and re-read.  You are right, when I worked in Corporate America in product managment, I did not spend that much time on pricing since being in food, it was usually dictated by competitive conditions.  However, my all time favorite pricing strategy was when I worked on saltines, a story for another day.  Now that I am in the service business, I use a lot of <br />psychology when it comes to pricing focused on the perceived outcome of the services provided, but I want to circle back and better understand how VEL would come into play.  One thing I have learned about pricing since being on my own, once I land a project, I realize I could have asked for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Strategic Pricing Using Value Equivalence Lines &#124; Constant Cogitation -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/04/strategic-pricing-equivalence-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Strategic Pricing Using Value Equivalence Lines &#124; Constant Cogitation -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=215#comment-90</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Greg Strosaker, Gagan Saxena. Gagan Saxena said: Strategic Pricing Using Value Equivalence Lines http://ow.ly/1z78d by @GAStroz &lt;&lt; For curious minds. Heady mix of math, money &amp; mktg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Greg Strosaker, Gagan Saxena. Gagan Saxena said: Strategic Pricing Using Value Equivalence Lines <a href="http://ow.ly/1z78d" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1z78d</a> by @GAStroz &lt;&lt; For curious minds. Heady mix of math, money &amp; mktg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

