<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweaking GTD for Better Weekly Task Prioritization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization</link>
	<description>Greg Strosaker on leadership, marketing, strategy, productivity, parenting autism, and running</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Jeff,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To answer your question, I don&#039;t change the context to @Week, it&#039;s just another category, and in the Weekly view I maintain a context-based grouping (plus, you can filter down to two categories on the Blackberry - say @Week and @Calls).  To be honest, Outlook has flags for &quot;Next Week&quot; and similar which would probably work too (much like you are describing for Lotus Notes and eProductivity), but I didn&#039;t think to try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>To answer your question, I don&#39;t change the context to @Week, it&#39;s just another category, and in the Weekly view I maintain a context-based grouping (plus, you can filter down to two categories on the Blackberry &#8211; say @Week and @Calls).  To be honest, Outlook has flags for &#8220;Next Week&#8221; and similar which would probably work too (much like you are describing for Lotus Notes and eProductivity), but I didn&#39;t think to try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyJDavis</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyJDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Greg -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting tweak for the trusted system.  I&#039;m (unfortunately) on Lotus Notes, and eProductivity, the system I use has a &quot;Today&quot; view which is basically a flag you set for the things you want to nail that day.  I&#039;m curious that if you actually change the context to @Week, you are basically getting away from context based task organization and back to old school prioritization, right?  What matters is that you are GettingMoreDone, which is what it&#039;s all about in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg -</p>
<p>Interesting tweak for the trusted system.  I&#39;m (unfortunately) on Lotus Notes, and eProductivity, the system I use has a &#8220;Today&#8221; view which is basically a flag you set for the things you want to nail that day.  I&#39;m curious that if you actually change the context to @Week, you are basically getting away from context based task organization and back to old school prioritization, right?  What matters is that you are GettingMoreDone, which is what it&#39;s all about in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Jeff,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To answer your question, I don&#039;t change the context to @Week, it&#039;s just another category, and in the Weekly view I maintain a context-based grouping (plus, you can filter down to two categories on the Blackberry - say @Week and @Calls).  To be honest, Outlook has flags for &quot;Next Week&quot; and similar which would probably work too (much like you are describing for Lotus Notes and eProductivity), but I didn&#039;t think to try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>To answer your question, I don&#39;t change the context to @Week, it&#39;s just another category, and in the Weekly view I maintain a context-based grouping (plus, you can filter down to two categories on the Blackberry &#8211; say @Week and @Calls).  To be honest, Outlook has flags for &#8220;Next Week&#8221; and similar which would probably work too (much like you are describing for Lotus Notes and eProductivity), but I didn&#39;t think to try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyJDavis</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyJDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Greg -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting tweak for the trusted system.  I&#039;m (unfortunately) on Lotus Notes, and eProductivity, the system I use has a &quot;Today&quot; view which is basically a flag you set for the things you want to nail that day.  I&#039;m curious that if you actually change the context to @Week, you are basically getting away from context based task organization and back to old school prioritization, right?  What matters is that you are GettingMoreDone, which is what it&#039;s all about in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg -</p>
<p>Interesting tweak for the trusted system.  I&#39;m (unfortunately) on Lotus Notes, and eProductivity, the system I use has a &#8220;Today&#8221; view which is basically a flag you set for the things you want to nail that day.  I&#39;m curious that if you actually change the context to @Week, you are basically getting away from context based task organization and back to old school prioritization, right?  What matters is that you are GettingMoreDone, which is what it&#39;s all about in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-69</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by GAStroz: I&#039;d like to thank @CoachClaudine for her help on improving my #gtd approach, as described in this post http://bit.ly/9HGUxv...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by GAStroz: I&#8217;d like to thank @CoachClaudine for her help on improving my #gtd approach, as described in this post <a href="http://bit.ly/9HGUxv.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9HGUxv..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Jim,&lt;br&gt;There is always a mix of basic tasks which stand alone and tasks that are part of a bigger effort.  In the GTD system, these bigger efforts (jobs, in your terminology) are called projects.  The key in project is, while you may identify multiple steps needed to complete the project, in general the task list shows only the &quot;next action&quot; to take on that project.  If there are &quot;subprojects&quot; to the project, they may each have their own next action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, I&#039;m working on rolling out an outbound marketing program right now (a project).  This consists of building our target list and providing the sales tools for the program (both of which are subprojects).  Each has a next action on my &quot;@Week&quot; list right now: for the first it&#039;s &quot;reformat spreadsheet for upload into our CRM system&quot; and for the second it&#039;s &quot;complete calling scripts for sales managers&quot;.  Both can be done in parallel.  Once I finish the first, the next action is &quot;upload program to CRM system&quot;.  Obviously, I can&#039;t do that until I finish the first action, so there&#039;s no use cluttering up my task list with it (if the progression were not as clear, I might list the tasks in a note associated with the project). The point is to only keep in front of you what you can actually act upon now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />There is always a mix of basic tasks which stand alone and tasks that are part of a bigger effort.  In the GTD system, these bigger efforts (jobs, in your terminology) are called projects.  The key in project is, while you may identify multiple steps needed to complete the project, in general the task list shows only the &#8220;next action&#8221; to take on that project.  If there are &#8220;subprojects&#8221; to the project, they may each have their own next action.</p>
<p>For example, I&#39;m working on rolling out an outbound marketing program right now (a project).  This consists of building our target list and providing the sales tools for the program (both of which are subprojects).  Each has a next action on my &#8220;@Week&#8221; list right now: for the first it&#39;s &#8220;reformat spreadsheet for upload into our CRM system&#8221; and for the second it&#39;s &#8220;complete calling scripts for sales managers&#8221;.  Both can be done in parallel.  Once I finish the first, the next action is &#8220;upload program to CRM system&#8221;.  Obviously, I can&#39;t do that until I finish the first action, so there&#39;s no use cluttering up my task list with it (if the progression were not as clear, I might list the tasks in a note associated with the project). The point is to only keep in front of you what you can actually act upon now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmatorin</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmatorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Imteresting.  Accomplishing a task is a great feeling.  Like the categorization concept.  However, based on years of strategic planning, I have learned that you have to find the management system that works best for you.  I have used various tools over the years.&lt;br&gt;One other thought Greg, the number of tasks needed to complete a job probably varies greatly by industry, by product vs. service, by size of the company as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imteresting.  Accomplishing a task is a great feeling.  Like the categorization concept.  However, based on years of strategic planning, I have learned that you have to find the management system that works best for you.  I have used various tools over the years.<br />One other thought Greg, the number of tasks needed to complete a job probably varies greatly by industry, by product vs. service, by size of the company as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudine Motto</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudine Motto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh!  Yes - makes perfect sense to show the completed tasks to illustrate for the post.  I wish more people would realize the benefit of taking the time to really learn the programs they use - can make such a difference when they know how to use the program to really work for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh!  Yes &#8211; makes perfect sense to show the completed tasks to illustrate for the post.  I wish more people would realize the benefit of taking the time to really learn the programs they use &#8211; can make such a difference when they know how to use the program to really work for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strosaker</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strosaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I really like the ability to maintain the contexts, Claudine, as those are most important.  I actually did change the view to hide completed tasks, I took the screenshot more for the effect on this post (to show in fact how many tasks were finished from the list).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the ability to maintain the contexts, Claudine, as those are most important.  I actually did change the view to hide completed tasks, I took the screenshot more for the effect on this post (to show in fact how many tasks were finished from the list).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudine Motto</title>
		<link>http://gregstrosaker.com/2010/02/tweaking-gtd-for-better-weekly-task-prioritization/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudine Motto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregstrosaker.com/?p=160#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Greg,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So glad the tweak worked well for you!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s the focus on the person and the individualized approach that makes coaching so powerful (regardless of the type of coaching) - we work off core concepts, but the solutions are tailored to your specific situation, your specific system, and what YOU want to ultimately be able to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you&#039;ve heard me say this before, but I love what I do!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Claudine&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S.: I&#039;m assuming you like to see the crossed off tasks as a sense of &quot;completion&quot; - if you don&#039;t though, let me know and I&#039;ll tell you how to tweak the view so you see only your current/active tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>So glad the tweak worked well for you!</p>
<p>It&#39;s the focus on the person and the individualized approach that makes coaching so powerful (regardless of the type of coaching) &#8211; we work off core concepts, but the solutions are tailored to your specific situation, your specific system, and what YOU want to ultimately be able to do.</p>
<p>I know you&#39;ve heard me say this before, but I love what I do!</p>
<p>Claudine</p>
<p>P.S.: I&#39;m assuming you like to see the crossed off tasks as a sense of &#8220;completion&#8221; &#8211; if you don&#39;t though, let me know and I&#39;ll tell you how to tweak the view so you see only your current/active tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
